| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: rework "dmapi" subtree build mechanism |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:29:43 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201103041937.p24Jbk5W004828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <201103041937.p24Jbk5W004828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> LIB_SUBDIRS = include lib > TOOL_SUBDIRS = ltp src m4 > +ifeq ($(HAVE_DMAPI), true) > +TOOL_SUBDIRS += dmapi > +endif Does this work with the way we generate source tarballs on make dist? In xfsprogs we have special variables for source files that don't get build. > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +# > +# Copyright (c) 2011 SGI All Rights Reserved. > +# I think a license would be more useful than all rights reserved here. Except for that the patch looks sane to me, and having a consistent build system is a good thing. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: some refinements on "make depend", Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix parallel make, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: rework "dmapi" subtree build mechanism, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: rework "dmapi" subtree build mechanism, Alex Elder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |