| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: introduce inode cluster buffer trylocks for xfs_iflush |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:55:35 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1298412969-14389-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1298412969-14389-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1298412969-14389-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> + * pass through will see the stale flag set on the inode.
> + */
> + error = xfs_iflush(ip, SYNC_TRYLOCK | sync_mode);
> if (sync_mode & SYNC_WAIT) {
> + if (error == EAGAIN) {
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> + /* backoff longer than in xfs_ifree_cluster */
> + delay(2);
Do we really need the delay here? It seems like we'd rather want to
keep going with scanning the next inode cluster and return here from
xfs_reclaim_inodes.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> index 32ba662..0ae48ff 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_sync_work {
>
> int xfs_syncd_init(struct xfs_mount *mp);
> void xfs_syncd_stop(struct xfs_mount *mp);
> +void xfs_syncd_queue_sync(struct xfs_mount *mp, int flags);
This hunk belongs into a different patch.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: kick inode writeback when low on memory, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: help: xfstests building error., Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: introduce background inode reclaim work, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: introduce inode cluster buffer trylocks for xfs_iflush, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |