| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: multithread phase 2 |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:57:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1294620248-17098-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <1294620248-17098-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-zmi; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Montag, 10. Januar 2011 Dave Chinner wrote: > This patch uses 32-way threading which results in no noticable > slowdown on single SATA drives with NCQ, but results in ~10x > reduction in runtime on a 12 disk RAID-0 array. Is the fixed 32-way number reasonable, or shouldn't that be "number of available cpu cores"-way? Why threading when you have a single core cpu? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services: Protéger http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531 // ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** // http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // // Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_repair: multithread phase 2, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RedHat, Novell and SGI xfs kernel module api, Larsen, Tore Høivaag |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs_repair: multithread phase 2, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: multithread phase 2, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |