| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:55:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012231304130.12482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101222175611.1c7d5190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D124B71.9030401@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223012655.2681c596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221928050.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101223005630.GJ4907@dastard> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012230442150.7452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012231304130.12482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:06:10 -0500 (EST) vous écriviez: > http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html > Something's wrong with the file create/stat/delete tests. Did you mount with "nobarrier"? Which drives, controller firmware, raid level, stripe width? BTW don't run only one test, it's meaningless. I always run at least 8 cycles (and up to 30 or 40 cycles) and then calculate the average and standard deviation, because one test among a cycle may vary wildly for some reason. You don't need the "char" tests, that doesn't correspond to any real-life usage pattern. Better run bonnie with the -f option, and -x with some large enough value. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| Previous by Date: | Haakon's Hall, info |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |