| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:06:20 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012221128440.5245@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:30:05AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Is there anyone currently using this in production? yes (in the past more than now) > How much ram is needed when you fsck with a many files on such a > volume? didn't check specifically, but with older xfsprogs it could easily use more than 16GB > Is inode64 recommended on a 64-bit system? it's for inode distribution, not 64-bit vs 32-bit system yes, enable that ... it should be the default > Any specific 64-bit tweaks/etc for a large 43TiB FS? if using hw raid teach mkfs about the array geom, that coupled with inode64 made a huge difference in performance that last time i did this |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Emmanuel Florac |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes?, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |