| To: | Ivan.Novick@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: inode64 mount option added after data exists |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:43:55 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C92BDD2E.1C75%ivan.novick@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <C92BDD2E.1C75%ivan.novick@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Ivan.Novick@xxxxxxx wrote: > Hi all, > > Quick question about the inode64 mount option. > > Is it safe to add this mount option to a file system that was > already created and wrote lots of data without it. Yes. > Will it still work as intended in this case (use 64 bit inodes)? Yes, for newly created inodes and data. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: pwrite hang when writing from mmaped buffer of the same page, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH v3] xfstests: pwrite hang when writing from mmaped buffer of the same page, Zhong, Xin |
| Previous by Thread: | inode64 mount option added after data exists, Ivan.Novick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inode64 mount option added after data exists, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |