| To: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_repair of critical volume |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:19:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4CDDBC5C.7020708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <75C248E3-2C99-426E-AE7D-9EC543726796@xxxxxxxx> <4CCD3CE6.8060407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <864DA9C9-B4A4-4B6B-A901-A457E2B9F5A5@xxxxxxxx> <201011121422.28993@xxxxxx> <4CDDBC5C.7020708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:14:52 -0600 vous écriviez:
> This isn't "robustness" Michael. If anything it's a serious problem.
I beg to disagree. Would it be better if instead of still having some
of the data, everything was lost? At what level of accidental
destruction do you think that the whole data set should be made
unavailable? 10%? 5? 1?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | cl arsnai fii, syaxa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_repair of critical volume, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair of critical volume, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair of critical volume, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |