Does anybody have a report how XFS behaves on a NetApp storage with thin
provisioning? They have a completely "weird" storage, their WAFL (write
anywhere file layout) together with deduplication and other things make
me think the best is to not-at-all specify any "performance options" in
mkfs/mount, like sunit/swidth or largeio, swalloc, etc.
Does someone have information on that?
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|