| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstests: use a common _filter_scratch function |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:44:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201010211900.o9LJ086G002762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <201010211900.o9LJ086G002762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:00:08PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > There are a number of tests that use a shell function called > "filter_scratch" or "_filter_scratch" in order to have the actual > scratch device or mount point show up in test output with a symbolic > name. There are two sets, each following a slightly different > convention. Put a common _filter_scratch function definition in > "common.filter" and have all test scripts use that instead. > Choosing one of the two conventions meant that a few test output > files had to be changed. > > In addition, add a call to _filter_scratch to test 185, and update > its output accordingly. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS Test Results Interpretation, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Possible deadlock when deleting from realtime section, Denny Priebe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstests: use a common _filter_scratch function, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: remove dead code in test 062, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |