On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010 Alex Elder wrote:
> PS Two more observations:
> - There is really no need for the characters to be truly random.
> Making the generated name unique and different from the
> original is sufficient. So (with the exception of the last
> five bytes) we can select the characters however we like.
> They could be a sequential series of names, for example,
> rather than computing a random value for each.
I was thinking the same when reading your description. Why not simply
"number" the file names from 1 to whatever count of files/dirs there is
within that dir?
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
|