| To: | Tore Høivaag <tore.hoivaag.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS on SSD, log/metadat on spindle? |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:46:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <CFFC47E79E870F4EBAD0CA24D8CD7652ECD04ECD67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <CFFC47E79E870F4EBAD0CA24D8CD7652ECD04ECD67@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:46:54 +0100 vous écriviez:
> anyone have experience with (c)xfs on SSD enabled raid? LSI
> 7900 (aka IS4600 aka IBM DS5300) with mixed SSD and FC drives. LSI
> FC4600 enclosure.
>
Yes, it works well, and about 50% faster on small IO (tested with
Adaptec 52445 though). Actually it largely depends upon the way you
distribute IO on the array, but it's basically comparable to a huge
read cache.
I also tried putting the XFS log on an SSD a couple of years ago, it's
really fast (but quite a waste of a good SSD).
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS on SSD, log/metadat on spindle?, Larsen, Tore Høivaag |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Contiguous file sequences, Roger Willcocks |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS on SSD, log/metadat on spindle?, Larsen, Tore Høivaag |
| Next by Thread: | [GIT PULL] xfs: metadata scalability, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |