Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't do memory allocation under the CIL context lo

xfs

To:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't do memory allocation under the CIL context lock
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 06:32:45 -0400
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1282522546-7892-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<1282522546-7892-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1282522546-7892-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 0/2] xfs: Fix issues found doing large inode count testing, Dave Chinner [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't do memory allocation under the CIL context lock, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't do memory allocation under the CIL context lock, Christoph Hellwig <= [PATCH 2/2] xfs: improve buffer cache hash scalability, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: improve buffer cache hash scalability, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: improve buffer cache hash scalability, Alex Elder

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] xfs: do not discard page cache data on EAGAIN, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: improve buffer cache hash scalability, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 1/2] xfs: don't do memory allocation under the CIL context lock, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 2/2] xfs: improve buffer cache hash scalability, Dave Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]