| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k sector drives |
| From: | Khelben Blackstaff <eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:02:11 +0300 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=ewDXufLHZJk0MMGg5kV0FbYSqXvGMj8cxdHBK+sEaiY=; b=n7g0cZRI4pRkR3zMrVKoUkQyS9jKOayIB6KfKi1/GBW6XcElNwIdVD9ocgg8X8IX/H xzpJUh/9Bpxet0jD0bhj0ZD59D3sXXjDU98PwVXtNj1QVaThZyKW0L47EV2Tf1puGpuq yXpu2ezczjE3e2CfHlXG5UOAiknQHNkK+pdrE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=qEg9zJpJPrxsnFYcAM5V2VGIxg0ZDG+mr3JwxNUk8UBAMDdpKskJdGJus9gmuKu1PM WxX0y8r5qq4q+fHYBowptKHQzINsQzIR0f6616VBRjSpuQDvpzRc7BcSrhCuG59VuBx7 fzzggWE+OPecM5T0Ub7IhfBfW6q2N1thlESXg= |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) |
> What MAY hurt, also for large writes, are the meta-data operations while > writing the file. (e.g. the file-size changes, journaling ...) > But i haven't tested that and can't say for sure how much that hurts. It hurts a lot. On my 1TB EARS when i was benchmarking unaligned partitions, untarring a linux kernel for example took ages. (tar output finished quickly but then you had to wait a long time till the shell prompt returns) With aligned partition, performance is normal. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Emmanuel Florac |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Khelben Blackstaff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |