| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k sector drives |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:56:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <201007231259.11714@xxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <201007211333.48363.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> <201007230809.28111@xxxxxx> <20100723095832.GA23174@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201007231259.11714@xxxxxx> |
Le Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:59:07 +0200
Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
> Thanks for clarification. Should I use "-s size=4096" despite the
> drive saying 512b sectors? It's a "hidden" 4K sector drive, so maybe
> declaring it extra for XFS helps performance? Or does it not matter
> at all?
I'd say it's the right time for a benchmark :)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |