| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: track AGs with reclaimable inodes in per-ag radix tree |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:17:00 -0400 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Mailing List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1279216900.2054.28.camel@doink> |
| References: | <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1279154300-2018-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1279216900.2054.28.camel@doink> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:01:40PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Using the same tag represent a perag with reclaimable > inodes as the tag representing an inode is reclaimable > is nicely consistent... Oh, didn't notice that when reviewing it. Not sure I like it too much. If we ever grow more tags on the perag tree this might get rather confusing. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: simplify and remove xfs_ireclaim, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: fix xfs_trans_add_item() lockdep warnings, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: track AGs with reclaimable inodes in per-ag radix tree, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: track AGs with reclaimable inodes in per-ag radix tree, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |