| To: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: noatime,nodiratime? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 May 2010 14:24:34 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4BF42725.8060903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4BF3F212.5030600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87mxvveqyq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BF42725.8060903@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 01:00:05PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Yes, the defaults for each parameter are in your mount man page. > logbsize=256K is higher than the default, which is 32K for any system with > over 32MB RAM. logbufs=8 will be the default if your blocksize is 64K. If > your blocksize is 4K you'll get logbufs=2 by default. This is all in the > XFS section of man mount. But it's not actually true anymore for a long time. XFS is always using 8 32k log buffers these days. I'll prepare an update for the mount man page to correct this. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: modify buffer item reference counting, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Nicolas KOWALSKI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |