| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr question for improvement |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:13:57 +0200 |
| Cc: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100417012415.GE2493@dastard> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <201004161043.11243@xxxxxx> <20100417012415.GE2493@dastard> |
Le Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:24:15 +1000 vous écriviez:
> XFS resists fragmentation better than most other
> filesystems, so defragmentation, while possible, is generally not
> needed.
There two systems nevertheless where I need to use xfs_fsr regularly to
keep decent performance : my test VMware server (performance dropped
down to abysmal level until I set up a daily xfs_fsr cron job), and a
write-intensive video server.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] xfs: kill off l_sectbb_mask, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | different log info for mkfs.xfs and xfs_growfs, Wengang Wang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr question for improvement, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr question for improvement, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |