Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends

xfs

Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends

To:	Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 5 Apr 2010 07:32:59 -0400
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<201003182254.o2IMsGKO001893@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<201003182254.o2IMsGKO001893@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:54:16PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> Odds and ends in "xfs_log_recover.c".  This patch just contains a
> bunch of minor things that didn't seem to warrant their own
> individual patches.

This is changing too many different things without much explanation.
I think it needs to be split and documented much better.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: encapsulate bbcount validity checking, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer, Hans-Peter Jansen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: encapsulate bbcount validity checking, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: don't use -s option to repquota, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]