| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: encapsulate bbcount validity checking |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Apr 2010 07:32:12 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <201003182254.o2IMs6g0001880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <201003182254.o2IMs6g0001880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:54:06PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > This replaces is a duplicated block of essentially identical code > in three spots with a call to a common helper routine. I don't think I really like this. It's adding a lot of indirections for some simple error reporting. > + if (bbcount > 0 && bbcount <= log->l_logBBsize) > + return 1; Adding a tiny helper just for this might be worthwhile, though. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | DEAR, MS.LULAMA XINGWANA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | DEAR, MS.LULAMA XINGWANA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: xfs_log_recover.c odds and ends, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |