| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: add delayed allocation @ ENOSPC exerciser |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:56:19 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1267597162-12092-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1267597162-12092-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1267597162-12092-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:19:20PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > + killall -9 dd > /dev/null 2>&1 This seems a bit dangerous. I have at least one old system that uses dd to continously read the kernel message buffer in the background, and there's tons of other potential dd uses. Given that we now require bash and bash has array support you might be able to store the pids of "our" dd instances in an array and loop over them. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2/3] xfsqa: fix size specification for scratch mkfs, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfsqa: fix size specification for scratch mkfs, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: add delayed allocation @ ENOSPC exerciser, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsqa: add delayed allocation @ ENOSPC exerciser, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |