| To: | Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:47:05 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4B72D3F3.2040308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4B45CFAC.4000607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B504B03.7050604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B6706CE.1020207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100208194226.GD9527@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B712166.9010701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100209103157.GA5197@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B72A9D1.8030101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100210145508.GA29047@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B72D3F3.2040308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:42:43PM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote: > Have any of these patches been sent to the stable team? And have these > patches been submitted to the upcoming 2.6.33 kernel? Everything before the current test patches is in 2.6.33-rc, I'm not sure what has made it to stable yet, but if I remember correctly Dave was going to send his fixes to -stable. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS status update for January 2010, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |