| To: | Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:42:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4B6706CE.1020207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AF0422D.1070104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114162126.GB17658@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0A8075.8080008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091211115932.GA20632@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3F9F88.9030307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100107110446.GA13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B45CFAC.4000607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B504B03.7050604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B6706CE.1020207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Patrick Schreurs wrote: > Hello Dave, > > I'm afraid we had another crash a few days ago. Have a look at the > screenshot. Can you make anything out of it? This server is running > 2.6.32.3 with your inode-reclaim patch applied and XFS_DEBUG still > enabled. Just wondering, which set of patches is this exactly? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix up fs_perms test used by 126, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix up fs_perms test used by 126, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim), Patrick Schreurs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |