Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet

To:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:18:07 -0500
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1263967126-7603-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<1263967126-7603-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:58:46PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> If the kill fails because the processes have already terminates,
> the output from kill (no such process) will cause the test to
> fail. Make sure kill doesn't output anything.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes, I see the same here,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet, Dave Chinner Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet, Dave Chinner

Previous by Date:	[PATCH] [RFC] xfstests: deprecate busted log printing tests, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix compile warning in doio.c, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: kill in 131 needs to be quiet, Dave Chinner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]