xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: reclaim inodes under a write lock

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: reclaim inodes under a write lock
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:18:36 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1263167508-9346-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1263167508-9346-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1263167508-9346-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:51:45AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Make the inode tree reclaim walk exclusive to avoid races with
> concurrent sync walkers and lookups. This is a version of
> a patch posted by Christoph Hellwig that avoids all the code
> duplication.

looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

FYI: I would rename xfs_reclaim_inode_now to just xfs_reclaim_inode,
but unless Alex wants to edit it let's just get the patch in for now.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>