| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V3] sort: Introduce generic list_sort function |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:52:35 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20100105122101.GR13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1262649295-28427-1-git-send-email-david__25057.2445955642$1262651404$gmane$org@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87eim4dbzw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100105122101.GR13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
> > Also it would seem cleaner to have it in a own file. > > That might make sense if we had a large number of generic sort > functions and it was difficult to tell the code apart, but we've > only got 2 right now.... I was more thinking of the case that it can be easily made a lib-y and then eliminated by the linker on non modular kernels if not needed (unfortunately that would require putting the EXPORT_SYMBOL somewhere else) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH V3] sort: Introduce generic list_sort function, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] benchmark results, Steven Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH V3] sort: Introduce generic list_sort function, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V3] sort: Introduce generic list_sort function, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |