Re: [PATCH 3/3] repair: compare superblock / AG headers fields against m

xfs

Re: [PATCH 3/3] repair: compare superblock / AG headers fields against m

To:	Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 3/3] repair: compare superblock / AG headers fields against manual counts
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 2 Jan 2010 06:10:55 -0500
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20091230224314.GD13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20091201150503.958283878@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091201151037.707510379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091230224314.GD13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 09:43:14AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Might be worth a comment here saying that we are only calculating
> totals from the ABTC btree scan. OTOH, is is worth checking that the
> two btrees add up to the same number of free blocks, same maximum
> length extent, etc?

Yes, I'll look into adding that additional check.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] repair: compare superblock / AG headers fields against manual counts, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	[RFC, PATCH 0/3] Kill async inode writeback, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] XFS: Ensure we force all busy extents in range to disk, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[RFC, PATCH 0/3] Kill async inode writeback, Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:	[PATCH] use CFLAGS in src/Makefile, Christian Kujau
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]