| To: | Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: benchmark results |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:27:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ext-users <ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912240205510.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912240205510.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:10 -0800 (PST) vous écriviez:
> - btrfs, ext4 are the overall winners
> - xfs to, but creating/deleting many files was *very* slow
xfs is slow at file creation/deletion if you mount it with barriers on
standard disk drives (not so with hardware RAID controllers).
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs 2.6.31.9 error, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Call trace with 2.6.27.39, aluno3 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Jfs-discussion] benchmark results, Christian Kujau |
| Next by Thread: | lockdep: inconsistent lock state, Christian Kujau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |