| To: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and DPX files |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:52:49 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200911021205.28006@xxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <4AEC2CF4.8040703@xxxxxxx> <4AEC4BAA.20606@xxxxxxx> <20091031174836.3fc9505b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200911021205.28006@xxxxxx> |
Le Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:05:27 +0100 Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > I believe for a 15 drive RAID-6, where 2 disks are used for > redundancy, the correct mkfs would be: > mkfs -t xfs -d su=65536,sw=13 /dev/sdXX Yes you're right, I replied a bit too quickly :) > Another thing to try is if it would help to turn disk cache writes > *on*, despite all warnings if the FAQ. The 3Ware is so slow it's almost unusable without write cache. I bet he already uses it anyway. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Jakob - Your Recent Nomination to Strathmore's Who's Who, Stathmore's Who's Who |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH] xfstests: add another quotaoff testcase to 220, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and DPX files, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and DPX files, AndrewL733@xxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |