| To: | Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:16:01 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bas Couwenberg <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091007011926.GB32032@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AD18C8D.90808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091012233854.GA29446@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091019011600.GO9464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091019035426.GB18296@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091020034048.GA9464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <89c4f90c0910210245h4691cd82hd1d63f5ed72fb2e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091022085937.GA2039@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <89c4f90c0910270341r7833f490g60810f2817eb0950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:19:44PM +0100, Tommy van Leeuwen wrote: > Another one just seconds ago. Might be more usefull then the last 2. Ist this one also with COFNIG_XFS_DEBUG enabled? May assert should have hit the condition we're seing in that one earlier. Anyway, it still looks like we can get inodes that are partially or fully torn down before entering ->destroy_inode. I'll try to figure out why. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: add another quotaoff testcase to 220, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [GIT PULL] two small xfs regression fixes, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim, Tommy van Leeuwen |
| Next by Thread: | Trace Enquiries , brianc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |