| To: | Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:52:23 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20091024133729.GA23125@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AE08DC7.7000200@xxxxxxx> <1AB9A794DBDDF54A8A81BE2296F7BDFE83AE08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091024133729.GA23125@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:08:37PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > Looks good. I will up the version number after get this pulled in. > > I will publish this and get the version number/dependency stuff > > straightened out before I take the change for xfsrestore. > > Please hold back for a while with making a release. So you made a relase without any communication to the developers and no time to respon. If this is the way SGI thinks they should work I think it's time to make the kernel.org trees an official new xfsprogs-ng tree and just ignore SGI. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Reply.........., Harry Barnes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |