| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs-masters] Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:22 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4ADF36E3.8080801@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4ACB3AC5.4010603@xxxxxxxx> <20091006131020.GA12343@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ADF36E3.8080801@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > The lockdep code to track this has been recently introduced.
> >
> > I've sent some patches to fix it ages ago, but so far no one has
> > bothered to review them.
>
> Christoph, remind me again which patch and I'll try to find time now
> that I'm getting Fedora bug reports. :)
I've recentlhy sent out some even simpler patches to sort this out, see
here:
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042857.html
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042858.html
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_quota remove error, r-yamauchi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_quota remove error, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfsprogs: add missing CHANGES entry, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |