| To: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: moving libhandle to /usr |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Oct 2009 19:44:25 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nathans@xxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200910061533.51365.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091006154249.GA1411@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200910061533.51365.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 06 October 2009 11:42:49 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default, > > and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually > > uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments > > in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway. > > > > Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and > > switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell? > > xfsdump uses it and xfsdump is installed into / by default right ? so > libhandle needs to be in /lib so long as xfsdump is in /sbin. Indeed, the makefile configuration currently builds it into /, while the configure default uses /usr. Yikes.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 4/5] xfs: mark inodes dirty before issuing I/O, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: moving libhandle to /usr, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: moving libhandle to /usr, Mike Frysinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: moving libhandle to /usr, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |