| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 |
| Cc: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4A80291D.6020200@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A80291D.6020200@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > This looks good Eric. > > > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > > enforcement too? > > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix locking in xfs_iget_cache_hit, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |