| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage |
| From: | KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:33:04 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Olaf Weber <olaf@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, "MASON, CHRISTOPHER" <CHRIS.MASON@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20090707101946.GB1934@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <bzyd48cc14d.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090707101946.GB1934@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Olaf Weber wrote: > > If the nr_to_write calculation really yields a value that is too > > small, shouldn't it be fixed elsewhere? > > In theory it should. But given the amazing feedback of the VM people > on this I'd rather make sure we do get the full HW bandwith on large > arrays instead of sucking badly and not just wait forever. At least, I agree with Olaf. if you got someone's NAK in past thread, Could you please tell me its url? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A rescue tool: xfs_irecover, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] bump up nr_to_write in xfs_vm_writepage, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |