| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:01:16 -0400 |
| Cc: | Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <961884583.292281245481464174.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <941396568.292261245481145500.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <961884583.292281245481464174.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:04:24AM -0400, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > I've seen this assertion before and if it's the problem I think it > is then it should be fixed with this patch: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00176.html > > It shouldn't be difficult to test this too - If you run about 1024 > dd writers to separate 100MB files and then run xfs_bmap on each > file afterwards it should assert. Thas is in a filesystem not big enough to actually fit those files, right? Might be worth adding a testcase like this.. Alex, can you give that patch a try? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: fallocate + read/write tests, ext4 regression tests, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Alexander Beregalov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.30-06725: xfs_fsr: Assertion failed: ip->i_delayed_blks == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 5991, Alexander Beregalov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |