| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block |
| From: | Richard Kolkovich <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:47:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4A2E900B.3070100@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4A2C8AD8.9030107@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20090608074230.GA28066@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090609160622.GE63930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A2E900B.3070100@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Richard Kolkovich wrote: > > Guys, > > > > After applying the patch, we get much further. xfs_repair then fails in > > phase 7: > > > > > > xfs_repair: phase7.c:47: set_nlinks: Assertion `fs_inode_nlink' failed. > > > > Aborted > > > > > > Any ideas on that one? Thanks! > > Yep, I meant to reply, I hit that one too. Haven't yet looked into that > one .... > > -Eric Any ideas on a workaround if not a fix? We really just want to get through the repair and see what (if anything) is still usable... Thanks! -- Richard Kolkovich IntraMeta Corporation richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Skip dump _cleanup if filesystem is not xfs, Felix Blyakher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Kernel 2.6.30: Memory/XFS leak, OOM killer kills many processes, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: catch bad depth in traverse_int_dir2block, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |