Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found

xfs

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found

To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:51:03 -0400
Cc:	xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<4A26B016.2080108@xxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4A26B016.2080108@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:17:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Now that libxfs etc is optional, 122 (which compiles on the fly)
> is failing if those extra headers are missing.

Oh, the great 122 tests.  Indeed without all the headers defining
the structures we can't actually check their size.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Online training benefits for emergency responders, Richard Cohen
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]