| To: | Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:47:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <811197347.242901240369616266.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1416563271.242851240369384712.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <811197347.242901240369616266.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Lachlan, any chance we could get you to resubmit the minimal locking fix for now? We can play with the test program than to find some cause the other corruptions. We also still have that non-freed attr fork patch that was somewhat related which we still need get done :P |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fsck.xfs proposed improvements, Mike Ashton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fsck.xfs proposed improvements, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Oops at xfs_bmbt_get_startoff in SLES 10 2.6.16, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |