| To: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:31:56 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, nathans@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200903271231.01055.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200902240010.25434.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> <200903081409.28808.agruen@xxxxxxx> <20090327160204.GA9306@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200903271231.01055.vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:30:59PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 27 March 2009 12:02:04 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I did some make dist and build the tarball tests with > > acl,attr,xfsprogs & co. > > > > We still run libtoolize, aclocal and autoconf when building a clean > > tree. I wonder if we should just get rid of the whole configure target > > and require a manual ./configure like most tools? > > `make dist` should produce a tarball that, when unpacked, people can run: > ./configure && make && make install Yes. The added complication is that the various xfs-cmds derived tools also run ./configure from a default target make which complicates the build system. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Link Exchange with oss.sgi.com, Annie Simanski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Corruption of in-memory data, Florian Hines |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0, Mike Frysinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4, Jan Kara |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |