| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:35:18 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090316100116.GA16218@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1237117603-26071-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090316075338.GA19858@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090316094019.GD26138@disturbed> <20090316100116.GA16218@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 06:01:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:40:19PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > If you drop the last patch (the iterator patch) does it work > > ok? > > No. With patches 1-5 applied we deadlock early on because pag_ici_lock > never gets released in xfs_sync_inodes_ag for the normal non-error case. Ah, then I screwed up the migration of the patches from one set of trees to another. I'll go back and rework this one, including your feedback and repost when done. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] [XFS] Use xfs_sync_inodes() for device flushing, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] XFS: Inform the xfsaild of the push target before sleeping, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/2] Fix a couple of random hangs., Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |