| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:01:16 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20090316094019.GD26138@disturbed> |
| References: | <1237117603-26071-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090316075338.GA19858@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090316094019.GD26138@disturbed> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:40:19PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > If you drop the last patch (the iterator patch) does it work > ok? No. With patches 1-5 applied we deadlock early on because pag_ici_lock never gets released in xfs_sync_inodes_ag for the normal non-error case. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0, Andreas Gruenbacher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/6] [XFS] Split inode data writeback from inode sync., Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |