| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] [XFSQA] Add simple delayed allocation ENOSPC test. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:23:36 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1237114181-18431-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1237114181-18431-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1237114181-18431-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 09:49:40PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Using a small (100MB) filesystem and writing lots of > single block files can result in spurious ENOSPCs > being reported. Reproduce this test case so we can confirm > that it gets fixed. Looks good. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] [XFSQA] Reduce the number of processes forked, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] [XFSQA] Test writing to ENOSPC, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2/3] [XFSQA] Add simple delayed allocation ENOSPC test., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] [XFSQA] Reduce the number of processes forked, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |