| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:13:21 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20090215064225.GA8830@disturbed> |
| References: | <20090126073136.384490000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090126073202.588218000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090215064225.GA8830@disturbed> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:42:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:31:47AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Spliting the task for a VFS-induced inode flush into two functions doesn't > > make any sense, so merge the two functions dealing with it. > > I just realised that we should really be calling xfs_inode_flush() from > xfs_sync_inodes_ag() - it open codes xfs_inode_flush() and doesn't > have any of the non-blocking flush code for async flushes... Given that we'll hopefully do batched flushes driven directly from the sync code re-introducing the helper now just to rip it out again a little later doesn't seem to useful to me. And the calling conventions for xfs_inode_flush were rather odd to start with anyway. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prevent lookup from finding bad buffers, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | tarballs generated by Makepkgs, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/17] xfs: merge xfs_inode_flush into xfs_fs_write_inode, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |