| To: | Ralf Liebenow <ralf@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS Kernel 2.6.27.7 oopses |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:50:45 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090205053847.GA24841@xxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Ralf Liebenow <ralf@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20090130222359.GB32142@xxxxxxxx> <20090201003744.GB24173@disturbed> <20090205053847.GA24841@xxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:38:47AM +0100, Ralf Liebenow wrote: > Hello ! > > Finally I found the time to compile and test the latest stable 2.6.28.3 kernel > but I can reproduce it: OK. .... > Hmmm ... can I do something to help you find the problem ? I can > reproduce it by creating some millon of hardlinks to files and then remove > some > million hardlinks with one "rm -rf" Interesting. Sounds like a race between writing back the inode and it being freed. How long does it take to reproduce the problem? Do you have a script that you could share? Next question - what is the setting of ikeep/noikeep in your mount options? If you dump /proc/self/mounts on 2.6.28 it will tell us if inode clusters are being deleted or not.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: download of attr_2.4.43-1.tar.gz, Marc Kleine-Budde |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS Kernel 2.6.27.7 oopses, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS Kernel 2.6.27.7 oopses, Ralf Liebenow |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Kernel 2.6.27.7 oopses, Ralf Liebenow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |