| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions) |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:01:42 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <200901282344.32351.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <200901270928.29215@xxxxxx> <20090128203703.GB3958@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200901282344.32351.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.13-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Strange. A bug in KMail with decoding GPG signaturesin *some* mails? > However I did find this only on the XFS mailing list so far. If I > find time I will take a closer look tomorrow. Yes, I am in a lot of mailing lists, but only here I see "invalid" sigs. Russell: Your 1st mail with sig was valid, the 2nd not. Maybe Martin can find the culprit. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS, Mikulas Patocka |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS, Mikulas Patocka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: invalidated gpg signatures (was: Re: xfs open questions), Martin Steigerwald |
| Next by Thread: | XFS trouble: task xfssyncd blocked for more than 120 seconds., Julian Einwag |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |