| To: | Danny ter Haar <dth@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:44:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20090109061043.GA31450@dth.net> |
| References: | <20090107180246.GA15218@infradead.org> <20090107182415.GA12039@dth.net> <20090107183115.GA6261@infradead.org> <20090107184420.GA15653@dth.net> <20090107185628.GA19255@infradead.org> <20090108215602.GA24479@dth.net> <20090109004609.GM9448@disturbed> <20090109012610.GA23075@dth.net> <20090109020800.GO9448@disturbed> <20090109061043.GA31450@dth.net> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:10:44AM +0100, Danny ter Haar wrote:
> # git bisect bad v2.6.28-git3
> # git bisect good v2.6.28-git2
>
> and take it from there.
Yes. Then it gives you a revision to test and you can use
git bisect next
to try the next one, or
git bisect skip
if the current version is bad due to some other reason (doesn't boot /
compile)
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsdump support for 64K page size, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2, Danny ter Haar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2, Danny ter Haar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2, Danny ter Haar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |