| To: | Igor Podlesny <for.poige+linux@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is". |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:21:24 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <43d009740812282139x7597aafbn4474455c1aa1e0e8@mail.gmail.com> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:39:55PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > -- Copying several rather big files (~ 25--45 GiB) from XFS on LVM-2 > on MDraid partition to another one, I had the system rebooted both > with 2.6.28 and 2.6.27.10 (accomplished using 2.6.24.7-rt(sic!)25). As > you probably understand, that's the case you even can't trace where's > the problem, at least on a desktop with GUI, not on server with plain > text display. Although, I'm afraid even text display wouldn't had a > chance to show anything, tracing that problem. You don't have 4K_STACKs enabled by default, do you? And instead of these rants bug reports would be more useful. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/20] xfs-cmds staging tree, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is"., Igor Podlesny |
| Previous by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.28-rc3-4786-g3c92ec8, xfs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hi! I've noticed that kernel.org advertises 2.6.28 as "The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is"., Igor Podlesny |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |