On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:46:09AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We don't initializ s.br_state in xfsidbg_btree_trace_record so gcc
> rightly complains about accessing it in xfsidbg_xbirec. Given that we
> don't get the state value from the tracing code just opencode printing
> the other which actually reduces code size and makes the XFS_BTNUM_BMAP
> case in xfsidbg_btree_trace_record more similar to the others.
Ping?
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c 2008-11-12 11:14:39.000000000
> +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c 2008-11-12 11:17:14.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2759,16 +2759,11 @@ xfsidbg_btree_trace_record(
> {
> switch (btnum) {
> case XFS_BTNUM_BMAP:
> - {
> - struct xfs_bmbt_irec s;
> -
> - s.br_startoff = ((xfs_dfiloff_t)l0 << 32) | (xfs_dfiloff_t)l1;
> - s.br_startblock = ((xfs_dfsbno_t)l2 << 32) | (xfs_dfsbno_t)l3;
> - s.br_blockcount = ((xfs_dfilblks_t)l4 << 32) |
> (xfs_dfilblks_t)l5;
> -
> - xfsidbg_xbirec(&s);
> + kdb_printf("startoff %Ld startblock %Lx blockcount %Ld\n",
> + ((xfs_dfiloff_t)l0 << 32) | (xfs_dfiloff_t)l1,
> + ((xfs_dfsbno_t)l2 << 32) | (xfs_dfsbno_t)l3,
> + ((xfs_dfilblks_t)l4 << 32) | (xfs_dfilblks_t)l5);
> break;
> - }
> case XFS_BTNUM_BNO:
> case XFS_BTNUM_CNT:
> qprintf(" startblock = %d, blockcount = %d\n",
>
>
---end quoted text---
|