| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:27:43 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <490E33D1.8030306@sandeen.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <490C7CAC.2070902@sandeen.net> <20081102220551.GG19509@disturbed> <490E33D1.8030306@sandeen.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:12:17PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Dave Chinner wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:58:36AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > >> Create a tape group for anything which expects > >> to dump to tape (I guess this is a superset > >> of "remote" and a few others). > >> > > > > Given that most ppl don't have tape drives, should these be left in > > the auto group now that they can easily be run by 'check -g tape'? I > > know I've never had a config to run them the *entire* time I've > > personally run XFSQA... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave. > > > Sounds like a plan. We probably don't even know (?) if they run > well enough to be in the auto group? Revised patch below: Looks OK to me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Urgent queue, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstest: confirm mkfs.gfs[2] in test 032, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |