| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:05:51 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <490C7CAC.2070902@sandeen.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <490C7CAC.2070902@sandeen.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:58:36AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Create a tape group for anything which expects > to dump to tape (I guess this is a superset > of "remote" and a few others). Given that most ppl don't have tape drives, should these be left in the auto group now that they can easily be run by 'check -g tape'? I know I've never had a config to run them the *entire* time I've personally run XFSQA... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux RAID & XFS Question - Multiple levels of concurrency = faster I/O on md/RAID 5?, Dan Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: create tape group, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |